Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Switzer Super Report
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per CSD:A7. This article was a chopped down version of the one which was - correctly - speedy deleted, and contained nothing indicating why this topic is notable. The article creator was a SPA for articles relating to this firm.. Nick-D (talk) 22:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Switzer Super Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable -- Whats new?(talk) 07:13, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I believe an article under this title was speedily deleted per WP:G11 less than a week ago, according to a talk page posting. -- Whats new?(talk) 07:16, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.