Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Forum of Deposit Insurers (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a WP:Soft delete; the article may be restored by any administrator upon request. MelanieN (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

European Forum of Deposit Insurers

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/European Forum of Deposit Insurers
• Articles for deletion/European Forum of Deposit Insurers (2nd nomination)

European Forum of Deposit Insurers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Exclusively promotional advert which is based on the organisations own website, which is where this sort of material belongs, not here. This is not appropriate content for Wikipedia. Blow it away. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

• Delete and be restarted as there's nothing imaginably convincing for companies and organizations notability here, nothing of it is solid enough. SwisterTwister talk 06:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.