Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mylene Sheath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with No prejudice against speedy renomination. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

The Mylene Sheath

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The Mylene Sheath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a nonnotable label considering the references that we do have are its own website. Sikonmina (talk) 06:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
• Keep Meets WP:MUSIC's sense of one of the more important indie labels. Chubbles (talk) 16:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Any references to support that assertion? HighKing⁺⁺ 21:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 06:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NCORP, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.