Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texephyr (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 21:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Texephyr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Zero WP:RS even after searching. Arguably WP:A7 but I believe the article does indicate it's importance? It just doesn't have any references to prove it. Soni (talk) 14:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and India. Soni (talk) 14:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- I am now aware of the 1st AFD Nomination. Of the sources linked there, 1 is dead, 2 are not WP:RS and this one is reliable (though it might fall under WP:PRSOURCE, I am not sure yet). 1 RS is still not enough, though admittedly I did not find this one on my last set of searches Soni (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Zero indications of notability. Totally fails GNG. Macktheknifeau (talk) 11:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Literally Zero independent reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.